masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.2K
active users

: Lower court could enforce code

Interviewed at NYU school, Justice also discussed the emergency docket & the historic number of women on the high court.

Justice Elena Kagan on Mon brushed aside concerns about whether lower-court judges could effectively enforce the ’s new ethics rules, saying those on the federal bench are more than capable of holding justices to account.

washingtonpost.com/politics/20

The Washington Post · Justice Kagan: Lower court judges could enforce Supreme Court ethics codeBy Ann E. Marimow

“I just think judges are not so afraid of us. I think there are plenty of judges around this country who could do a task like that in a very fair-minded & serious way” said.

Kagan was expanding on her recent suggestion that Chief Justice appoint an outside panel of highly experienced judges to review allegations of wrongdoing or decisions by the justices, some of whom face questions over unreported gifts & conflicts of interest in key cases.

adopted a code of conduct specific to the 9 justices last fall for the first time. But the policy was quickly panned because it does not include a way to examine alleged misconduct, review whether the justices have recused themselves when necessary, or clear or sanction justices who might violate the rules.

Having an cmte made up of well-respected lower-court judges “seems like a good idea to me in terms of ensuring that we comply with our code of conduct going forward in the future; it seems like a good idea in terms of ensuring that people have confidence that we’re doing exactly that,” said during a wide-ranging conversation at NYU School w/professor Melissa Murray….

Related ICYMI:

Justice reports concert tickets, in 2023 financials

Chief Justice & Justice Samuel Alito are the only members of [that we know of; ] who own individual stocks.

Alito received concert tickets valued at $900 last year from a German princess known for her views & sold stock in a beer company targeted by anti-+ activists, acc/to his financial disclosure form released Fri.


washingtonpost.com/politics/20

The Washington Post · Justice Alito reports concert tickets, stocks in 2023 financial reportBy Tobi Raji

continues to own individual in >2 dozen companies — a practice that is permitted, but that advocates caution can lead to conflicts of interest that require from key cases. The justice reported owning stock in Abbott Laboratories, Boeing & ConocoPhillips, among several other companies.

Chief Justice is the only other member of who owns individual stocks; most other justices invest in mutual funds.

’s 2023 disclosure report was made public nearly 3 months after the reports by the rest of the justices; he requested an extension to file, as he has done in previous yrs.

The filing did not include any travel reimbursements, a category that has drawn increased interest since the revelation in recent years that Justice — &, to a lesser extent, Alito — had received private jet trips & lavish vacations from wealthy benefactors & had not disclosed them.

The report also showed that has repaid most of a from Edward Jones taken in 2015 & originally valued at between $250,001 & $500,000. Alito noted that he had updated past disclosure forms from 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2022, where he said mention of the loan was *inadvertently* omitted.


Justice reported receiving concert tickets from Gloria von Thurn und Taxis, a European socialite nicknamed “Princess TNT” by Vanity Fair. …It’s unclear where the concert was located or how the trip to the venue was funded.

The NYT reported in 2018 that the princess’s castle in Regensburg, Germany, has become a hub for & cardinals like German cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller.

Gloria von Thurn und Taxis, Müller & Brian S. Brown, a prominent anti-+ rights activist, visited & Justice Brett M. at in 2019, acc/to a photo Brown posted on…[social media].


nytimes.com/2018/12/07/world/e

expressed her appreciation in an email sent to , an influential litigator whose clients have won cases at . Shackelford runs the , a $25 million-a-year organization that describes itself as “the largest organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious liberty for all Americans.”

Shackelford read Thomas’ email aloud on a July 31 private call w/his group’s top donors.

wrote that ’s opposition to court-reform proposals gave a boost to certain judges. Acc/to Shackelford, Thomas wrote in all caps: “YOU GUYS HAVE FILLED THE SAILS OF MANY JUDGES. CAN I JUST TELL YOU, THANK YOU SO, SO, SO MUCH.”

Shackelford said he saw Thomas’ support as evidence that , who “can’t go out into the political sphere & fight,” were thankful for their work to block reform.

On the same call, Shackelford attacked Justice as “treasonous” & “disloyal” after she endorsed an mechanism for the court’s newly adopted code in a recent public appearance. He said that such an ethics code would “destroy the independence of the judiciary.” (This past weekend, Justice said she too was open to an enforceable ethics code for .)

@Nonilex this is the only appropriate response to this 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

@Nonilex
Nothing to see here

Just two SCOTUS "justices" in a private meeting with foreign money, a religious leader and an anti-gay marriage advocate.

FFS!!! We need #SCOTUSReform immediately.

@Nonilex Destroy the independence of the judiciary by *checks notes* empowering lower-court judges.

@Nonilex I’m trying to wrap my head around how fighting court reform is any business for "the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious liberty for all Americans” …?

Could it be that they’re simply protecting the corrupt judges currently on the court b/c they like their right-wing rulings?

If the political makeup of the court were different, this org would be very much in support of court reform

Tons of opinions, but zero principles